Nevada Gadolinium Claims: Lawsuit Information for Nevada Residents

Lawyers Helping Nevada Persons and Families Harmed by MRI Contrast Side Effects

Gadolinium Attorney

Research shows that contrast agents used to enhance magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can cause a serious and chronic illness known as Gadolinium Deposition Disorder (GDD). Gadolinium is a heavy metal used in contrast dyes to aid the viewing of internal organs during MRI. Aware of gadolinium's toxicity to humans, drug companies promised that patients with normal kidney function would routinely excrete gadolinium and experience no MRI contrast agent side effects. In fact, gadolinium from MRI contrast agents can be retained in toxic deposits throughout the body, potentially causing the patient to develop Gadolinium Deposition Disorder. The disease has no cure and is characterized by chronic pain in the skin and bones, kidney damage, and cognitive loss; extreme cases involve a hardening of the skin that can result in death.

Nations around the world have taken aggressive steps to protect their citizens, banning the production of certain harmful gadolinium contrast dyes. Several FDA Gadolinium warnings have been issued, yet MRI dye agents containing the toxic substance are still in wide use in Nevada and around the United States. Persons in Nevada who have undergone multiple MRIs with high gadolinium levels are at risk for developing gadolinium deposition disorder at any time. Evidence suggests industry executives were aware of the danger of gadolinium deposition disorder long before the FDA alerted the public. An estimated 30 million Americans undergo MRI each year.

A high profile gadolinium deposition disease lawsuit made national news in 2017 -- that of Gena Norris, wife to the celebrity actor Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris' wife filed MRI contrast lawsuits against three drugmakers, alleging she has suffered from gadolinium deposition disease as a result of subsequent MRIs. Gena, Chuck Norris' wife, is seeking more than $10 million in damages and compensation. Our attorneys believe that persons in Nevada who have suffered MRI contrast dye side effects may be entitled to meaningful compensation by filing lawsuits related to gadolinium deposition disease and MRI contrast side effects suffered in Nevada. Our attorneys offer free case evaluations to persons and the family members of persons residing in Nevada harmed by the same disease as Chuck Norris' wife.

Nevada Gadolinium Lawsuit

Should I File a Gadolinium Lawsuit in Nevada

Persons and the family members of persons in Nevada who have suffered health problems as a result of exposure to gadolinium during MRI may be entitled to real compensation by filing a gadolinium lawsuit. Pharmaceutical companies that have manufactured MRI dyes for decades were aware of the substance's toxicity long before the general public was warned. Persons harmed by MRI contrast dyes in Nevada are entitled to a free, no-obligation case review for gadolinium lawsuits with our firm. Lawyers handling Gadolinium lawsuits for Nevada families work on contingency, meaning you will never pay legal fees unless we win compensation for you. Read full gadolinium lawsuit information from attorneys handling MRI contrast side effects claims from Nevada plaintiffs.

Nevada Gadolinium Lawyers FAQ

Nevada MRI Lawsuit FAQs

This page provides answers to common questions about filing a MRI contrast lawsuit for Nevada residents. Compiled by attorneys handling Nevada Gadolinium lawsuit claims, this information applies to most general questions regarding lawsuits for MRI contrast side effects. Our attorneys handling Gadolinium deposition disease lawsuit claims for Nevada families also offer free, no-obligation case consultation. If your questions are not answered by reading this page or you would prefer to speak directly with a lawyer handling Nevada MRI side effects lawsuits, please complete our contact form. Read full Nevada Gadolinium lawsuit questions and answers.

Gadolinium MRI Lawyer

Gadolinium Lawyers for Nevada Residents

Having won millions of behalf of families harmed by large corporate entities, our gadolinium lawyers for Nevada cases are prepared to bring their expertise and significant resources to your aid in Nevada. Representing clients from Nevada, our gadolinium lawyers will pursue justice no matter how complex the case. Contact our gadolinium attorney team serving Nevada residents for a free, no-obligation consultation. Read full information from gadolinium attorneys for filing a claim for MRI contrast issues or gadolinium deposition disease in Nevada.

Lawsuits for Gadolinium Deposition Disease in Nevada: Do I Need to File a Lawsuit to Make a Claim?

Persons who have suffered from MRI contrast side effects in Nevada may be entitled to compensation through filing gadolinium lawsuits against the manufacturers. When Chuck Norris's wife filed three gadolinium lawsuits in 2017, the public learned about the threat of gadolinium deposition disease. Now persons and family members of persons who have experienced chronic pain, kidney damage, skin problems, and cognitive loss as a result of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in Nevada are filing gadolinium lawsuits to obtain compensation for pain, suffering, and medical expenses.

More than 30 million Americans undergo MRI each year, and most MRI procedures make use of contrast dyes containing gadolinium to enhance visibility of internal organs and tissues. While gadolinium has long been known for its toxicity to humans, manufacturers promised consumers that the heavy metal was routinely expelled by the kidneys and posed no risk to healthy individuals. Today we know that even people with normal kidney function are at risk for developing gadolinium deposition disease in Nevada, whereby metal deposits build up in the body and cause serious and chronic side effects. Evidence suggests industry executives have long since been aware of the threat of gadolinium deposition disease yet continued manufacturing the products in question for more than a decade without warning consumers or medical professionals.

Gadolinium Compensation for Nevada Residents

Filing a claim against MRI contrast dye producers can secure financial compensation for the medical expenses, lost income, and suffering resulting from MRI gadolinium side effects for persons residing in Nevada. Having represented clients in almost every major drug safety litigation, our firm is uniquely positioned to provide expert legal counsel for gadolinium lawsuits. We offer free, no-obligation gadolinium lawsuit case review to Nevada persons and family members of persons who have suffered from side effects of gadolinium retention after MRI.

To speak with one of our attorneys handling gadolinium MRI claims for plaintiffs from Nevada, simply complete our online contact form or use the chat feature to speak with a representative. One of our attorneys handling gadolinium lawsuits filed by Nevada residents will contact you promptly to answer your questions as definitively as possible.

Nevada Gadolinium Lawsuits

Gadolinium Lawsuits Are Not Class Action Lawsuits

Many people in Nevada wonder whether gadolinium lawsuits for MRI side effects will actually result in real compensation for Nevada families. Our attorneys assure Nevada families that gadolinium deposition disease lawsuits are not merely symbolic. Precedents from other similar cases where plaintiffs were harmed by a dangerous drug or medical device register in the millions. For example, our firm secured $72 million and $55 million settlements for clients in talcum powder cancer cases during 2017. Chuck Norris' wife, who has filed gadolinium lawsuits for MRI contrast issues against three manufacturers, is seeking more than $10 million in damages.

Gadolinium lawsuits endeavor to win the compensation Nevada plaintiffs deserve and hold the companies accountable for their deplorable actions. Evidence suggests industry executives were aware of the danger of MRI contrast agents long before FDA gadolinium warnings were released. These cases will likely be consolidated as multidistrict litigation (MDL), a legal procedure that allows similar cases to be resolved at once, while still preserving the unique details of each case. Settlements are determined based on the individual details of each case and the type and degree of suffering of each plaintiff.

Our attorneys provide Nevada families with legal representation for gadolinium lawsuits on a contingency basis, meaning we charge no legal fees unless we win compensation on your behalf. We offer free, no-obligation consultations for persons and families in Nevada who believe they may have grounds for a gadolinium MRI lawsuit.

Nevada Gadolinium Lawsuit Claims: No Fees Unless We Collect for You

We will represent all persons from Nevada involved in a Gadolinium lawsuit on a contingency basis, meaning our lawyers never charge legal fees unless we win compensation in your case. For a free no-obligation consultation please fill out our short online contact form and one of our MRI contrast side effects attorneys serving Nevada families will contact you to answer any of your questions.

No-Cost, No-Obligation Gadolinium Lawsuit Case Review If You or a Loved One Suffered from MRI Contrast Side Effects in Nevada

Nevada MRI Lawsuit Questions and Answers

Nevada MRI Lawsuit

Having represented clients in nearly every major pharmaceutical litigation in the United States, our attorneys are uniquely equipped to answer your questions regarding MRI contrast issues in Nevada. We have won millions on behalf of clients harmed by dangerous drugs and medical devices. If you are a resident of Nevada and are considering filing a lawsuit, this page provides answers that apply to most general MRI lawsuit questions regarding Gadolinium side effects in Nevada. Simply contact our firm and one of our experienced lawyers handling Gadolinium lawsuit claims for MRI side effects filed by residents of Nevada will contact you in the near future to answer your questions, completely free of charge.

Who is eligible to make a Nevada gadolinium claim file a MRI lawsuit in Nevada?

Any person who has undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and has suffered from MRI side effects from gadolinium in Nevada, or family members of such a person, may qualify to file a Nevada Gadolinium lawsuit against the manufacturers of MRI contrast dye.

What is the fee for having my MRI contrast claim reviewed?

Our attorneys serving Nevada residents are available to speak with you about your circumstances and offer an analysis of your case free of charge and without further obligation. Use the contact form or chat feature to contact an attorney handling MRI contrast issues lawsuits from Nevada for your free case review.

How do I know if I am at risk for gadolinium deposition disease from MRI contrast agents?

Anyone in Nevada who has undergone MRI that utilized gadolinium-based dye (which includes most contrast agents) may be at risk for retaining gadolinium and developing gadolinium deposition disease. One study showed that gadolinium deposits can build up in the body of a person with normal kidney function after four MRIs. Men and women, people of all ages and races in Nevada, are all at risk for gadolinium side effects from MRI.

What does it cost to file a MRI contrast lawsuit for a resident of Nevada?

Our attorneys serving Nevada residents always work on a contingency basis, meaning we charge no legal fees unless we win compensation on your behalf. In other words, we invest the significant resources of our law firm to achieve justice on your behalf, and you only have to pay for our legal services if we are successful. Contact our firm to learn more about Nevada residents filing an MRI lawsuit for gadolinium deposition disorder.

Will MRI lawsuits originating from Nevada be converted into a national class action, where the plaintiff receives very little in compensation?

MRI lawsuits originating from Nevada will not be a class action. Major product liability cases such as this are typically consolidated through Multidistrict Litigation (MDL), which allows for greater efficiency in the courts while still awarding monetary compensation on the basis of each individual case. Chuck Norris' wife is seeking more than $10 million in compensation through three different MRI contrast dye lawsuit claims.

I am not the sort of person that sues when something goes wrong. Is it really necessary to file a lawsuit?

Most American families would rather not get involved in a lawsuit, for a variety of reasons. But if you or a loved one has suffered from a severe illness causes by a dangerous medical device or drug, you are bound to encounter significant medical fees. Between treatment, hospital stays, long term care, lost income, and other costs, the medical expenses can be enough to cripple a family financially. The cost of healthcare is constantly rising, making it impossible to predict how much you may ultimately require to cover medical costs. Furthermore, no amount of money can undo the wrong caused by a dangerous drug or medical device. An MRI lawsuit can recover financial security for your family and highlight a company's violation of consumer trust. Many corporations only improve their safety standards when the threat of major litigation forces their hand. In addition to helping your own family get the compensation that you deserve, your lawsuit may pressure a company to become a better corporate citizen and prevent other patients from suffering the same fate in the future.

What are the time limits in Nevada for filing an MRI lawsuit for contrast agent side effects?

Many states do have times limits that apply to product liability cases such as MRI dye cases. In most cases, a diagnosis of gadolinium deposition disease from MRI will fall within the time limits if an attorney is contacted in the near future. To learn about time limits that apply to your Nevada claim, please complete our contact form or use the chat feature. One of our attorneys handling MRI side effects lawsuit claims from Nevada residents will contact you promptly.

Leading Gadolinium Attorneys Offer Free Nevada Case Review

The gadolinium lawyers at the Onder Law Firm offering legal representation to Nevada families have distinguished themselves as leaders in the realm of product liability litigation, holding large corporations accountable for the harm they have caused American families. Recognizing the very serious nature of Nevada gadolinium deposition disease claims, the firm has committed its significant resources to providing the nation's premier gadolinium attorney representation for persons and family members of persons harmed by MRI contrast dye in Nevada.

When pharmaceutical corporations choose profits at the expense of consumer safety, our firm is always at the front lines, fighting on behalf of individuals and families. In this case, corporate executives were aware of the risk for gadolinium deposition disease yet continued to manufacture and market dangerous MRI contrast agents. Hundreds of millions of Americans were exposed to a serious health risk as a result. It is the mission of our gadolinium lawyers serving families of Nevada to pursue justice no matter how complex the case, and we make no exception in this deeply entrenched case. Our gadolinium attorneys believe that persons and the family members of persons who have been harmed by this dangerous substance in Nevada may be entitled to significant compensation for their suffering.

Our gadolinium lawyers serving Nevada have represented clients in nearly every product liability case pertaining to dangerous drug and defective medical devices, and we are the nation's leader in window blind cord litigation. In addition to winning on behalf of our clients, we take pride in asserting pressure on corporations that have stepped out of line. Through their tireless efforts, our gadolinium attorneys are working on behalf of clients in Nevada to win the compensation they deserve.

No Fees Unless We Collect for You -- Nevada Gadolinium Deposition Disease Claims

We will provide legal representation for anyone in Nevada involved in a gadolinium lawsuit on a contingency basis, which means that we will not charge any legal fees unless we win compensation for you. Anyone who has suffered from gadolinium side effects i=in Nevada after undergoing one or more MRI, or is a family member of such a person, is eligible to receive a free, no-obligation case review from our attorneys serving residents of Nevada harmed by gadolinium deposition disease. Simply contact our firm through the online contact form or the chat feature and one of our gadolinium lawyers serving Nevada families will contact you promptly to discuss your MRI case.

The Onder Law Firm

OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others. The firm has represented thousands of persons in these and other products liability litigation, including DePuy hip replacement systems, which settled for $2.5 billion and Pradaxa internal bleeding, which settled for $650 million. The Onder Law Firm won over $300 million in four talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits to date and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation. For more information call 1-877-663-3752.

Nevada Gadolinium Lawyers

Onder Law Has Been Covered By:

Onder Law on ABC News Onder Law on the New York Times Onder Law on USA Today Onder Law on Chicago Tribune Onder Law on LA Times Onder Law on Nightline