Research shows that contrast agents used to enhance magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can cause a serious and chronic illness known as Gadolinium Deposition Disorder (GDD). Gadolinium is a heavy metal used in contrast dyes to aid the viewing of internal organs during MRI. Aware of gadolinium's toxicity to humans, drug companies promised that patients with normal kidney function would routinely excrete gadolinium and experience no MRI contrast agent side effects. In fact, gadolinium from MRI contrast agents can be retained in toxic deposits throughout the body, potentially causing the patient to develop Gadolinium Deposition Disorder. The disease has no cure and is characterized by chronic pain in the skin and bones, kidney damage, and cognitive loss; extreme cases involve a hardening of the skin that can result in death.
Nations around the world have taken aggressive steps to protect their citizens, banning the production of certain harmful gadolinium contrast dyes. Several FDA Gadolinium warnings have been issued, yet MRI dye agents containing the toxic substance are still in wide use in North Dakota and around the United States. Persons in North Dakota who have undergone multiple MRIs with high gadolinium levels are at risk for developing gadolinium deposition disorder at any time. Evidence suggests industry executives were aware of the danger of gadolinium deposition disorder long before the FDA alerted the public. An estimated 30 million Americans undergo MRI each year.
A high profile gadolinium deposition disease lawsuit made national news in 2017 -- that of Gena Norris, wife to the celebrity actor Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris' wife filed MRI contrast lawsuits against three drugmakers, alleging she has suffered from gadolinium deposition disease as a result of subsequent MRIs. Gena, Chuck Norris' wife, is seeking more than $10 million in damages and compensation. Our attorneys believe that persons in North Dakota who have suffered MRI contrast dye side effects may be entitled to meaningful compensation by filing lawsuits related to gadolinium deposition disease and MRI contrast side effects suffered in North Dakota. Our attorneys offer free case evaluations to persons and the family members of persons residing in North Dakota harmed by the same disease as Chuck Norris' wife.
Persons who have suffered from MRI contrast side effects in North Dakota may be entitled to compensation through filing gadolinium lawsuits against the manufacturers. When Chuck Norris's wife filed three gadolinium lawsuits in 2017, the public learned about the threat of gadolinium deposition disease. Now persons and family members of persons who have experienced chronic pain, kidney damage, skin problems, and cognitive loss as a result of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in North Dakota are filing gadolinium lawsuits to obtain compensation for pain, suffering, and medical expenses.
More than 30 million Americans undergo MRI each year, and most MRI procedures make use of contrast dyes containing gadolinium to enhance visibility of internal organs and tissues. While gadolinium has long been known for its toxicity to humans, manufacturers promised consumers that the heavy metal was routinely expelled by the kidneys and posed no risk to healthy individuals. Today we know that even people with normal kidney function are at risk for developing gadolinium deposition disease in North Dakota, whereby metal deposits build up in the body and cause serious and chronic side effects. Evidence suggests industry executives have long since been aware of the threat of gadolinium deposition disease yet continued manufacturing the products in question for more than a decade without warning consumers or medical professionals.
Filing a claim against MRI contrast dye producers can secure financial compensation for the medical expenses, lost income, and suffering resulting from MRI gadolinium side effects for persons residing in North Dakota. Having represented clients in almost every major drug safety litigation, our firm is uniquely positioned to provide expert legal counsel for gadolinium lawsuits. We offer free, no-obligation gadolinium lawsuit case review to North Dakota persons and family members of persons who have suffered from side effects of gadolinium retention after MRI.
To speak with one of our attorneys handling gadolinium MRI claims for plaintiffs from North Dakota, simply complete our online contact form or use the chat feature to speak with a representative. One of our attorneys handling gadolinium lawsuits filed by North Dakota residents will contact you promptly to answer your questions as definitively as possible.
Many people in North Dakota wonder whether gadolinium lawsuits for MRI side effects will actually result in real compensation for North Dakota families. Our attorneys assure North Dakota families that gadolinium deposition disease lawsuits are not merely symbolic. Precedents from other similar cases where plaintiffs were harmed by a dangerous drug or medical device register in the millions. For example, our firm secured $72 million and $55 million settlements for clients in talcum powder cancer cases during 2017. Chuck Norris' wife, who has filed gadolinium lawsuits for MRI contrast issues against three manufacturers, is seeking more than $10 million in damages.
Gadolinium lawsuits endeavor to win the compensation North Dakota plaintiffs deserve and hold the companies accountable for their deplorable actions. Evidence suggests industry executives were aware of the danger of MRI contrast agents long before FDA gadolinium warnings were released. These cases will likely be consolidated as multidistrict litigation (MDL), a legal procedure that allows similar cases to be resolved at once, while still preserving the unique details of each case. Settlements are determined based on the individual details of each case and the type and degree of suffering of each plaintiff.
Our attorneys provide North Dakota families with legal representation for gadolinium lawsuits on a contingency basis, meaning we charge no legal fees unless we win compensation on your behalf. We offer free, no-obligation consultations for persons and families in North Dakota who believe they may have grounds for a gadolinium MRI lawsuit.
We will represent all persons from North Dakota involved in a Gadolinium lawsuit on a contingency basis, meaning our lawyers never charge legal fees unless we win compensation in your case. For a free no-obligation consultation please fill out our short online contact form and one of our MRI contrast side effects attorneys serving North Dakota families will contact you to answer any of your questions.
Having represented clients in nearly every major pharmaceutical litigation in the United States, our attorneys are uniquely equipped to answer your questions regarding MRI contrast issues in North Dakota. We have won millions on behalf of clients harmed by dangerous drugs and medical devices. If you are a resident of North Dakota and are considering filing a lawsuit, this page provides answers that apply to most general MRI lawsuit questions regarding Gadolinium side effects in North Dakota. Simply contact our firm and one of our experienced lawyers handling Gadolinium lawsuit claims for MRI side effects filed by residents of North Dakota will contact you in the near future to answer your questions, completely free of charge.
The gadolinium lawyers at the Onder Law Firm offering legal representation to North Dakota families have distinguished themselves as leaders in the realm of product liability litigation, holding large corporations accountable for the harm they have caused American families. Recognizing the very serious nature of North Dakota gadolinium deposition disease claims, the firm has committed its significant resources to providing the nation's premier gadolinium attorney representation for persons and family members of persons harmed by MRI contrast dye in North Dakota.
When pharmaceutical corporations choose profits at the expense of consumer safety, our firm is always at the front lines, fighting on behalf of individuals and families. In this case, corporate executives were aware of the risk for gadolinium deposition disease yet continued to manufacture and market dangerous MRI contrast agents. Hundreds of millions of Americans were exposed to a serious health risk as a result. It is the mission of our gadolinium lawyers serving families of North Dakota to pursue justice no matter how complex the case, and we make no exception in this deeply entrenched case. Our gadolinium attorneys believe that persons and the family members of persons who have been harmed by this dangerous substance in North Dakota may be entitled to significant compensation for their suffering.
Our gadolinium lawyers serving North Dakota have represented clients in nearly every product liability case pertaining to dangerous drug and defective medical devices, and we are the nation's leader in window blind cord litigation. In addition to winning on behalf of our clients, we take pride in asserting pressure on corporations that have stepped out of line. Through their tireless efforts, our gadolinium attorneys are working on behalf of clients in North Dakota to win the compensation they deserve.
We will provide legal representation for anyone in North Dakota involved in a gadolinium lawsuit on a contingency basis, which means that we will not charge any legal fees unless we win compensation for you. Anyone who has suffered from gadolinium side effects i=in North Dakota after undergoing one or more MRI, or is a family member of such a person, is eligible to receive a free, no-obligation case review from our attorneys serving residents of North Dakota harmed by gadolinium deposition disease. Simply contact our firm through the online contact form or the chat feature and one of our gadolinium lawyers serving North Dakota families will contact you promptly to discuss your MRI case.
OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others. The firm has represented thousands of persons in these and other products liability litigation, including DePuy hip replacement systems, which settled for $2.5 billion and Pradaxa internal bleeding, which settled for $650 million. The Onder Law Firm won over $300 million in four talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits to date and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation. For more information call 1-877-663-3752.